A Harvard study shows when viewing
another person, your brain collects information about race and sex first before
all else. When you see someone or an
image of a person, your brain’s primary focus is to gather information on
gender and race before any other analysis. This could be partly because of the cultural
emphasis Americans place on these two classifications. In Racism
without Racist, Bonilla-Silva discusses the relationship between gender and
race, arguing that they share a similar trajectory. This is partly due to their position as
oppressed groups under the dominant masculine male. Our minds primary focus is to determine
gender and race so we may evaluate our internal value of the person being
viewed. If the person is a woman or has
different color skin, they are generally thought of as an unequal.
Bonilla-Silva
argues that women, specifically from the white working class, are most likely
to have more relationship and better relate to minorities who generally share
similar environments. This can be
attributed to four generalities within this classification. First, these white working class women have a
greater chance of being raised in a racially mixed neighborhood. Second, they are more likely to have friends
from racial minorities. Third, they are likely to be politically progressive;
leading them to believe that change must be made in order to better the lower
classes. Lastly, these women are more
likely to date across the color line.
All of these characteristics attribute to a more racially educated
person who sees the humanity in others and not just the color of their
skin.
These factors, argues
Bonilla-Silva, is what makes working class white women more likely to be
racially progressive. Racial
progressives general acknowledge that being born a white male can give you an
advantage in today’s society. In
Bonilla-Silva’s study on college women who were raised in the lower class, he
found they were more racially progressive based on their common experiences
with oppression. Bonilla-Silva states, “actors
who experience multiple oppressions are more likely to share literally a “social
space” as well as a set of experiences that tend to develop a sense of
commonality.” Minorities in the working class
are oppressed because they are part of a minority thought to be unequal to
white males while also being oppressed because of their status of lower
class. Similarly, working class women
are oppressed not only because they are not as masculine as males but also
because of their social class level.
Multiple oppressions from the same oppressor create a community of commonality
within which even they believe they are inferior as exhibited in the subject’s
acknowledgement of the white male birthright.
Using Bonilla-Silva’s theory of
racial progressivism of similar “subordinates”, it is easy to understand why
our brains register gender and race even before a first impression of the
person as a human being can be established.
We base our interactions with others through a “race and gender prism”
which directs our feelings and attitude towards a certain person of a different
social class, skin color, or gender.
http://psychcentral.com/news/2013/10/12/your-brain-first-notices-race-gender-before-all-else/60650.html
http://psychcentral.com/news/2013/10/12/your-brain-first-notices-race-gender-before-all-else/60650.html
No comments:
Post a Comment