It should not shock
anybody that minorities are the main targets of arrest for a lot of the crimes
within inner cities, and urban suburbs. Crime is just a part of our society,
but how we deal with those crimes and the people who commit those crimes is
another story entirely. When we think of certain crimes we as a society like to
put a face or color to the crime. If it relates to drugs or guns we assume that
it had to be a black or brown person. So what do people do? They pre judge that
same black or brown person, and assume that because of the color of their skin
and where they live, they are the automatically guilty of having illegal drugs,
or guns.
His
act of racial profiling people is very prominent in a lot of paces and urban
communities, especially New York City. New York City has an act that allows its
police officers to judge persons based on the way that they look and where they
live, and to “investigate” that person to make sure that they are not carrying
illegal drugs or guns. This act is called stop
and frisk, which has been going on for a few years now and has caused a lot
of issues with the police and citizens of New York City. The stop and frisk act
was implemented to decrease the violence of the city, by taking drugs and guns
off the street. But it is also causing more harm than good because it is
affecting the Latino and black communities the most. Even more so the young
male minority population in New York City.
The
statistics say it all, according to the New
York City Civil Liberties Union, in 2012, there were 532,911 stops which 473,644
were totally innocent (89 percent). Also 284,229 were black (55%), 165,140 were
Latino (32%), and 50,366 were white (10%). The numbers seem to not add up. Why
are black and Latinos the main targets? Nothing says that they commit crimes
more often than any other race. Another fact is that nine out of ten people
stopped by police, are innocent, and that there has not been a major decrease
in crime since the act was implemented.
New
York is not the only city that has implemented this demeaning act, Baltimore is
another city that has been utilizing this act. Other cities like Chicago,
Detroit, and Los Angeles have also been considering using this tactic to lower the
crime rate, and get guns and drugs off the streets. But as The Civil liberties
union states “Stop-and-Frisk abuses
corrode trust between the police and communities, which makes everyone less
safe”. So we need other ways to deal with crimes and criminals, also we
need tactics that do not target minority populations. Especially the young minority’s
males of inner cities, and urban suburbs surrounding the cities. We can’t keep
having authorities abusing their power and making false assumptions of the citizens
they are paid to protect.
http://www.nyclu.org/issues/racial-justice/stop-and-frisk-practices
Javier Rodriguez
No comments:
Post a Comment