Known
in New York as ‘Local Law 71,’ stop and frisk procedures were implemented post
September 11th as an effort to help curve violence. The thought
process behind this legislation is that stop and frisk is less intrusive, and
takes less time than an arrest. However, the law allows officers free reign to
stop whomever they wish. This is further exacerbating the issue of racial
profiling.
Stop and frisk is defined as: “The
situation in which a police officer who is suspicious of an individual detains
the person and runs his hands lightly over the suspect's outer garments to
determine if the person is carrying a concealed weapon (New York Civil
Liberties Union).” As outlined in this definition, police are given discretion
to implement a stop and frisk procedures when it is deemed necessary. However,
this has caused some major issues in regards to racial discrimination.
The New York Civil Liberties Union
has estimated that there have been reporting these issues. Their article and
data can be found here: http://www.nyclu.org/issues/racial-justice/stop-and-frisk-practices.
They report that since
2002, New Yorkers have been subjected to stop and frisk procedures over 4
million times. The majority of those searched are African American or Latino,
while 9 out of 10 of those searched were found innocent. This raises questions
in regards to the ethics of these procedures.
Looking at the current methods employed,
it is obvious that these procedures are used in a discriminatory way. This
discrimination delegitimizes the intent of the police force, which is to
protect and to serve all citizens equally. Failure to recognize this
discrimination only increases hostility between police and minority groups.
This is even recognized by the police union of New York.
As of 2013, a lawsuit has been filed
to repeal the stop and frisk policy. In October 2013 the police union of New
York announced that it will be backing the lawsuit: http://colorlines.com/archives/2013/10/ny_police_union_joins_lawsuit_against_stop-and-frisk_law.html. They intend to
support this lawsuit, because the policy has proven to cause issues for the
department, as well as those they serve. They hope that the repeal of this
policy will help to protect both officers and citizens. By having this support,
it is more likely that the lawsuit will be more effective.
The removal of the stop and frisk
policy is detrimental for policing in New York City. The policy has allowed for
discrimination on a large scale, as well as threatens the rights of citizens.
With the recent support from the police union of New York, it is more likely that
this policy change will occur. Stop and frisk is a policy that delegitimizes
policing, and causes wide spread discrimination against the Latino and African
American populations of the city. Its removal is crucial for race relations in
New York.
No comments:
Post a Comment